Will More States Acquire Nuclear Weapons?
Member Activities

Will More States Acquire Nuclear Weapons?

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

On 14 December, APLN Executive Director Shatabhisha Shetty was featured in Foreign Affairs where she shared her opinion on the likelihood that the number of states with nuclear weapons will increase in the next decade.

“Although there are a number of states with nuclear latency, including Japan, South Korea, and Iran, the NPT [Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty] regime remains robust enough in political, practical, and normative terms to prevent breakout. The international opprobrium and consequences of developing nuclear weapons—for instance, sanctions (or further sanctions), political isolation, and regional security dilemmas—are likely to remain an effective deterrent to dissuade these countries from treading this path. Moreover, managing the financial and economic fallout of COVID-19, at least in Asia, will also be a constraining factor in the potential development of nuclear weapons over the next decade. The United States will remain an important military ally for nuclear-latent Asian countries to help mitigate their security concerns.”

Read the original article here.

Related Articles
  • States Parties to the TPNW Must Adopt the IAEA Additional Protocol
    MEMBER ACTIVITIES

    States Parties to the TPNW Must Adopt the IAEA Additional Protocol

    2 Dec 2021 | John CARLSON

    NUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE - APLN Member John Carlson discusses discrepancies in the application of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).

  • Disparity, Escalation Key Issues for NPT Review
    MEMBER ACTIVITIES

    Disparity, Escalation Key Issues for NPT Review

    11 Jan 2022 | Manpreet SETHI

    THE TRIBUNE - APLN member Manpreet Sethi explains why India should echo the P5 statement to its advantage.

  • Not a Big Deal
    MEMBER ACTIVITIES

    Not a Big Deal

    12 Jan 2022 | Shyam SARAN

    THE TRIBUNE - APLN member Shyam Saran views the P5 statement from a different perspective, questioning its credibility and addressing why it is difficult to feel reassured by it.