Dealing with the DPRK Nuclear Challenge: Exploring the Options
Policy Briefs

Dealing with the DPRK Nuclear Challenge: Exploring the Options

APLN Policy Brief 44

The following is a summary. Click on the adjacent link to download the full brief.

Washington holds that “all options are on the table” in dealing with North Korea’s nuclear and missile challenge. While there are dozens of variations on the theme, there are really only four categories of options in dealing with Pyongyang. The two extremes – regime acceptance and regime removal – need to be set aside, at least for the time being. This leaves regime transformation – “bringing Kim Jong-un to his senses, not to his knees” as one American admiral put it – or regime destabilization through non-military means. Washington, through at least four previous administrations, has been trying to transform the regime. But neither the incentives nor the consequences have thus far been sufficient to persuade Pyongyang to give up its nuclear ambitions. UN Security Council Resolution 2371 represents the first real attempt to make the consequences severe enough to bring the North back to the negotiating table, where it’s been suggested that economic incentives will be provided if denuclearization proceeds. But it remains to be seen if they, unlike previous iterations, will be vigorously enforced by all parties. If not, regime destabilization or regime change via non-military means may become the least worst option short of acquiescence or war.

About the Author

Ralph Cossa (ralph@pacforum.org) is President of the Pacific Forum CSIS, a Honolulu-based foreign policy research institute affiliated with the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

 

Image: Pixabay stock, David Peterson.

Related Articles
  • North Korea is the Litmus Test for a Nuclear Weapons Ban
    COMMENTARIES

    North Korea is the Litmus Test for a Nuclear Weapons Ban

    10 Jul 2017 | APLN

    A UN negotiating conference has just adopted a treaty banning nuclear weapons. Will this influence North Korea? And, if not, what’s the point?

  • Northeast Asia Regional Meeting 2017
    EVENT REPORTS

    Northeast Asia Regional Meeting 2017

    21 Jun 2017 | APLN

    In this regional meeting: NK Nuclear Issues; The effectiveness of the NPT; East Asia and the nuclear umbrella; Regional and global non-proliferation initiatives; Denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula.

  • 7th Annual Meeting
    EVENT REPORTS

    7th Annual Meeting

    30 May 2017 | APLN

    The APLN convened in Jeju against looming nuclear threats, heightened levels of regional uncertainty, and the draft publication of a UN convention to prohibit the acquisition of nuclear weapons.