What keeps Asia-Pacific’s nuclear experts up at night?
Weekly Newsletters

What keeps Asia-Pacific’s nuclear experts up at night?

 

 

24 April 2026

This week, we are delighted to introduce our new Quarterly Nuclear Memo. Authored by Senior Research Adviser, Manpreet Sethi, the memo provides expert analysis and summaries of nuclear developments shaping the regional security environment over the course of the year. With the NPT Review Conference fast approaching, we are also releasing the findings of the inaugural APLN Network Membership Survey, which captures high-level insights from senior Asia-Pacific policy practitioners. Additionally, we feature Senior Associate Fellow John Carlson’s response to ROK Foreign Minister Cho Hyun’s APLN exclusive commentary on the South Korean nuclear armament debate.

Our recent network activities continue to examine a range of complex global challenges, from the future of nuclear arms control and the agency of middle powers to Vietnam’s aircraft diplomacy, and more.

The inaugural issue of our Quarterly Nuclear Memo, written by Senior Research Adviser Manpreet Sethi, covers January to April 2026. The Memo assesses developments across four categories (Disruptive, Stabilising, Worrisome, and Dialogue-based) to provide a concise overview of the evolving nuclear landscape. From the expiry of New START and military strikes on nuclear facilities to preparations for the NPT Review Conference, the memo offers essential expert context for policymakers.

Read the Nuclear Memo

The inaugural APLN Membership Survey reveals how the Asia-Pacific’s most senior nuclear policy practitioners assess today’s nuclear risks. With cyberattacks on nuclear command-and-control systems identified as the greatest emerging threat, and concerns over testing resumption and the collapse of arms control frameworks also ranking high, the report underscores a pivotal period of transition for the Asia-Pacific and the broader non-proliferation regime.

Download the full survey

Non-Proliferation as a Strategic Imperative:
Experts respond to ROK Foreign Minister

In response to ROK Foreign Minister Cho Hyun’s APLN exclusive commentary that addressed the South Korean nuclear armament debate, John Carlson warns that the erosion of the international rules-based order and declining confidence in US deterrence are dangerously driving a renewed interest in the “merits” of nuclear weapons. He argues that middle powers must assert their influence to defend the NPT’s legacy while pressuring nuclear-armed states to prioritise risk reduction and disarmament. 

Read the Pulse

APLN has over 180 members from 24 countries in the Asia-Pacific.
Each week, we feature their latest contributions
to global and regional security debates.

See all member activities

 

 

India, Indonesia & the shared vision of Middle Powers

Shyam Saran, former Indian Foreign Secretary, wrote for The Tribune and contended that today’s middle powers wield significantly more agency than in the Bandung era. India and Indonesia must come together again to articulate a shared vision for the middle powers.

Arms Control Was Invented to Reassure Each Other That the Intentions Are Not Aggressive: An Interview for Dr. George Perkovich, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Fumihiko Yoshida, Director of Research Center for Nuclear Weapons Abolition, Nagasaki University (RECNA), interviewed George Perkovich to discuss the future of nuclear arms control and the mounting challenges to the global nuclear order amid heightened geopolitical uncertainty.

Piloting Pragmatism: Vietnam’s Aircraft Diplomacy through the COMAC Deal

Hoang Thi Ha, Senior Fellow and Co-coordinator of the Regional Strategic and Political Studies Programme at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, highlights that Vietnam’s move toward Chinese-made COMAC aircraft represents a calculated experiment rather than a strategic pivot.

Asian NATO Versus Pragmatic Multi-Alignment: Assessing Middle-Power Realignment Pathways in Trump 2.0

Cheng-Chwee Kuik, Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Asan Institute of Policy Studies, evaluated the viability of an ‘Asian NATO’ by juxtaposing it with a ‘pragmatic multi-alignment’ approach, presenting them as two competing paradigms for middle-power realignment in the Trump 2.0 era.

Was this newsletter forwarded to you?
Sign up here to receive weekly updates from APLN directly to your inbox.

Do you want direct updates on non-proliferation and disarmament issues
in the Asia-Pacific?

Before it’s in the newsletter, it’s on social media.
Follow APLN for direct updates in your favorite social media feed.

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

YouTube

LinkedIn

Copyright © Asia-Pacific Leadership Network.
All rights reserved.

4th fl., 116, Pirundae-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea, (03035)
Tel: +82-2-2135-2170
Email: apln@apln.network

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.