Indonesia’s hedging plus policy in the face of China’s rise and the US-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific region
THE PACIFIC REVIEW
APLN member Dewi Fortuna Anwar published a paper titled “Indonesia’s hedging plus policy in the face of China’s rise and the US-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific region”, arguing that Indonesia adopts a hedging strategy by engaging all sides to maximize benefits and mitigate risks, while promoting ASEAN-centric inclusive and cooperative multilateralism to shape the Indo-Pacific’s international order. Below is the abstract of the paper, and the full article can be found here.
Indonesia regards the shift in the center of economic gravity to Asia, marked by the rise of China and India following the earlier Asian tigers, as a welcome phenomenon that can benefit its own economic development. However, while celebrating the economic dynamism of the Indo-Pacific region, Indonesia also views with great concern China’s assertiveness in pursuing its claims over the whole of the South China Sea, as well as the re-emergence of major power rivalry, particularly between the United States and China as the incumbent and ascending superpower respectively, which can disrupt regional stability and prosperity. With its ‘free and active’ foreign policy doctrine Indonesia adheres to non-alignment, and as a matter of principle does not take sides in any great power competition. Indonesia’s policy in managing regional uncertainty which offers both opportunities for cooperation and threats of conflicts can best be described as hedging plus to ensure both its strategic autonomy and agency. It entails engaging all sides to maximize benefits while mitigating risks at both the national level and through ASEAN. At the same time, as the world’s largest archipelagic state straddling the Indian and the Pacific oceans, and the largest member of ASEAN, Indonesia carries out middle-power diplomacy by playing a leading role in promoting ASEAN-centric inclusive and cooperative wider East Asian multilateralism, helping to shape both the institutional and normative pillars of the International Order in the Indo-Pacific.